Brandon Smith:アメリカは 偽旗作戦による被害を口実に 北朝鮮に報復戦争を開始しそうだ

はじめに


・…という予測を Brandon Smith がしているので紹介する。

・物騒なのはこの偽旗作戦には核が使われる可能性があると。

さわり(デタラメ)


・アメリカの都市もしくは在外基地が(自作自演の)核攻撃を受けるケースすら想定できると。

Will there be a nuclear event? Yes. If war takes place in North Korea then it is likely they will use a nuclear device somewhere in retaliation. We may even see a nuclear event as a false flag catalyst for starting the war in the first place. This will not be a global threat, but a mushroom cloud over any American city or outpost is enough to scare the hell out of most people. It is all that will be needed.



ざっとこんな主張(デタラメ)


・この秋以降、アメリカの国内政治や経済状況(国家債務上限など)は深刻な行き詰まりが確実視されている。北朝鮮との戦争はこの行き詰まりから国民の目を逸らすには最適。

・アメリカの世論の大勢は、北朝鮮が先に攻撃してきた場合に限って、北朝鮮に報復攻撃することを支持している。

・中国の北朝鮮に対する姿勢も大きく変化し、国連で経済制裁に賛成した。北朝鮮が先に手を出した場合、アメリカの報復攻撃を容認するだろう。

・さらに中国は国際金融グローバリスト(IMF など)に協調している。

・そして国際金融グローバリストは局所的戦争を望んでいる。

・…というわけで、偽旗作戦が必要となる。


一部引用


20170817_trump-northkorea.jpg

How does the establishment rationalize a contested debt ceiling increase while also diverting blame away from themselves on the continued decline in U.S. and global fiscal data? War! Not necessarily a "world war" as so many are quick to imagine, but a regional war; a quagmire war that will put the final nail in the U.S. debt coffin and act as the perfect scapegoat for the inevitable implosion of the current stock market bubble. The international banks have much to gain and little to lose in a war scenario with North Korea.

I predict that there will be an attack blamed on North Korea. Either North Korea will be prodded into a violent reaction, or, a false flag event will be engineered and tied to Pyongyang. Remember, for the first time ever, China has essentially backed off of its opposition to invasion of North Korea as long as North Korea "attacks preemptively." Why? Why didn't they make this exception back in 2013? Because now the international banks want a distraction and China is giving them the opening they require.




That said, if we are to believe the latest polls, unfortunately, one thing is clear: The American people, on both sides of the political spectrum, are becoming more galvanized around supporting a potential conflict with North Korea. For the establishment, war is a winning sell, at least for now.



・中国の北朝鮮に対する姿勢が、これまでとは大きく変化した。

In 2015, it was China, not the U.S., that sounded the alarm over North Korea's nuclear program, indicating that Pyongyang might have technology well beyond American estimates. It was this warning that triggered the slow buildup to today's fear over a fully capable intercontinental ballistic missile package in the hands of North Korea. It seems obvious to me that China plays the role of North Korea's friend as long as it serves the interests of the globalist agenda, and then China turns on North Korea when the narrative calls for a shift in the script. It is China that opens and closes the door to war with North Korea; a China that is very cooperative with the IMF and the push towards total globalization.

In 2013, China presented the narrative of stalwart opposition to U.S. invasion. In 2017, China has left the door wide open.


・北朝鮮が先に手を出したら、中国は中立…という点がこれまでとは大きく異なっている。

Both alternative and mainstream media outlets latched onto recent statements made by Beijing proclaiming that China "would not allow regime change in North Korea." What many of them forgot to mention or buried in their own articles, though, was that this was NOT China's entire statement. China also asserted that they would REMAIN NEUTRAL if North Korea attacked first. I cannot find any previous instance in the past when China has made such a statement; a statement that amounts to a note of permission.


Ref: http://www.alt-market.com/articles/3254-korean-war-part-ii-why-its-probably-going-to-happen

(2017-08-17)
関連記事

コメントの投稿

非公開コメント

プロフィール

横着者 (ご連絡はコメント欄にて)

Author:横着者 (ご連絡はコメント欄にて)

最新記事
最新コメント
最新トラックバック
月別アーカイブ
カテゴリ
検索フォーム
RSSリンクの表示
リンク
ブロとも申請フォーム

この人とブロともになる

QRコード
QR