Buzz Aldrin が TV インタビューで 「月面着陸中継」について奇妙な発言 (+追加)

履歴


(2022-06-14) 追加。写真と関連過去記事を追加。
(2022-06-12) 作成


前置き


- Daniel Liszt が取り上げている。Joseph Farrell もこの話に同意しているので単なるヨタ話でもなさそう。

手抜き


i saw a
41:50
clip of buzz aldrin uh talking on conan o'brien and this is a weird one when they say oh
41:57
you know the host is saying i remember you know watching the moon landing on tv and he turns to him he says no no you
42:03
weren't this is we weren't able to send pictures from the moon you were watching an animation yeah
42:09
i mean there's some disclosure for you there's a little disclosure for you yeah

20220612_buzz_aldrin.jpg

動画(1:06:20)


Joseph Farrell COG NORTHCOM UFO Emergency Danger!


関連


2015年07月29年、Buzz Aldrin が証言:「月面で UFO を目撃、立ち去れと命じられた」と証言 (+追加) (2016-12-14)

コメント 1


- インタビューにおける Buzz Aldrin のこの発言だが、発言の部分的な切り出しではなく全体の文脈を理解した上でないと判断は難しい。だが、

we weren't able to send pictures from the moon

という Buzz Aldrin の発言が本当なら、これは過去の事実に反している。この程度のことは当時の技術レベルでも容易に実現できていた。

コメント 2


- 仮にだが…。問題のインタビュー全体の文脈からしても Daniel Liszt や Joseph Farrell の解釈どおりだったとする。

- その場合、

  ・Buzz Aldrin は陰謀論を揶揄するつもりでこの発言をしたのだ

 と解釈すると全体が整合する筈。

- つまり、彼は

we weren't able to send pictures from the moon

 というあり得ない理由に基づいて月面着陸は捏造であることを示唆した。

- これは「月面着陸は捏造だ」という陰謀論への揶揄を意図したものだったが、惜しむらくは婉曲的すぎて彼の意図が伝わりづらかった。

(2022-06-12)




関連の過去記事



NASA の月着陸シーンの映像(の一部?)が捏造である証拠 (全体) (2016-01-12)

(2022-06-14)

この記事の完了度:100%

Peter Levenda : 1945-08 に日本が朝鮮半島で原爆実験をしていた

手抜き


- 54:45 1945-08 に日本が朝鮮半島で原爆実験を…日本人の情報関係者が告白

54:45
actually happen right now there's
54:47
information that the Japanese had
54:50
detonated an atomic device in August of
54:53
1945 off the coast of Korea and there
54:57
are Japanese intelligence officers who
54:59
come
54:59
all over the story who are insisting
55:00
that it took place if that's true we
55:04
have to rewrite the end of world war 2


講演動画(1:32:44)


Secret Space Program by Peter Levenda Full Documentary YouTube 720p


コメント


- この件については日本語でも訳書(下)が出ている。だが専門家からの批判も多く、私はかなり懐疑的。CIA あたりが得意とする捏造工作の臭いもする。



20220130_book.jpg

ロバート・ウィルコックス著、矢野義昭訳 『成功していた日本の原爆実験 隠蔽された核開発史』、 勉誠出版、2019-08-01




20220130_ab_p13.jpg
13頁


20220130_ab_p14.jpg
14頁


(2022-01-30)

Peter Levenda : フリー・エネルギー装置は長らく存在していた

手抜き


1:25:30 長らくフリー・エネルギー装置(or その類)が存在してきたことを我々は知っている。

we know that technologies exist
1:25:33
for instance that would give us free
1:25:35
energy or close to free energy and
1:25:37
they've been existence for a long time
1:25:39
we can't get access to that you know
1:25:42
because of government policy is because
1:25:44
of secrecy because of classified
1:25:46
documents because of the opposition by
1:25:49
corporations so our lives are on the
1:25:52
line you know because of these policies
1:25:56
that are taking these positions that are



講演動画(1:32:44)


Secret Space Program by Peter Levenda Full Documentary YouTube 720p


コメント


- Peter Levenda はナチスやオカルト、歴史には博識だが、惜しむらくは科学技術や経済学には疎い。それゆえにこのような誤った判断(*1)を下してしまっている。

(*1)


- 誤った判断…

- 証拠データが皆無。さらに、彼のこの主張が事実だったと仮定すると、多数の致命的な矛盾が生じる。科学技術面での矛盾は過去記事で何度も述べてきたが、経済学にも矛盾しまくっている。

- 現代社会は全てがカネのパワーで動いている。彼のこの主張はそのカネの動きに完全に矛盾している。ありえない。フリー・エネルギー装置を語る 民間の UFO/オカルト研究者 は経済学にも疎いから、自家醸造したマクロ経済理論モドキで「なぜフリー・エネルギー装置が社会から秘匿されているのか?」を解説するが(例: Steven Greer や Richard Dolan)全て破綻している。

(2022-01-30)

Joseph Farrell の読み

前置き


- Joseph Farrell (博士, Univ. Oxford)は TTSA から参加を打診された人物(辞退)。

- UFO 問題のみならず、現在の政治経済を含めた世界情勢を独自の視点から俯瞰している。一見、些細だが確かに奇妙だ、裏に何かあるのでは…という材料を幾つも丹念に拾い上げ、点を点を繋げて、大胆な仮説を組み立てている。 その意味で、知的パズルとしても、陰謀論としてもよくできていて面白い。

- だが、大半の人々はもはや Facebook や Twitter の短文しか読めなくなっているので、Joseph Farrell のファンはごくごく少数派。

手抜き


27:51
haven't this is the harpers ferry 2.0
27:54
moment




they were doing exactly
46:32
what you're talking about which is the
46:34
administration was looking for on those
46:36
ships nuclear armaments coming in


動画(1:02:52)


Dark Journalist & Dr. Joseph Farrell: HotZone Government War Games & The UFO File


(2021-11-05)

John DeSouza : NYT は専用 Fax 機で…

前置き


- John DeSouza は元 FBI 捜査員。

- 表彰実績のある 元 FBI 捜査員でも、このレベルの噂(NYT は専用 Fax 機で…)を真に受けている(or 真に受けたふりをしている)のか…と妙に感心したので記録しておく。

手抜き


- 1:23:50

- NYT と CNN は全く信用できない。過去の実績がそれを証明している。だが政治家は彼らを信じている。

- 特にNYT には専用の Fax 機があり、それで全マスコミに司令を出している。

音声書写(自動生成)


展開

let you know that nathan as well
80:10
john thank you for that yeah it uh as
80:13
always all the links and that the guest
80:16
shares with me is all in the description
80:18
below and i always urge you to go and
80:19
check it out because there's always more
80:21
that either we don't get to uh to be
80:24
talked about and uh do you i'm sure you
80:27
probably have a way to be contacted as
80:28
well or no if not that's okay i just
80:31
don't want to
80:32
give that information out and it not
80:34
being true
80:36
yes no i can always be contacted through
80:38
my website johntamilbooks
80:41
johntelebooks.com
80:44
johnthomabooks.com because uh right now
80:46
i believe uh there's a youtube channel
80:48
your website facebook so all of these
80:50
who are watching interested in seeing
80:53
what uh what else john has to offer
80:55
please check it out and john thank you
80:57
again i appreciate that for the discount
80:59
so take advantage of that using your
81:01
forehead
81:03
uh so i have the next question is uh
81:05
from paulie
nnn81:07
uh paulie you are unmuted on my end and
81:09
go ahead and ask a question
81:12
sure so you talked about how uh
81:15
people are losing trust in the media and
81:18
it's like the soviet union i think i
81:20
agree with that i have a question so
81:23
uh every once in a while you'll hear
81:25
something where
81:26
basically all the news nighttime news
81:29
maybe not local news we'll just
81:31
coordinate and just start
81:34
saying something like a phrase like the
81:36
new normal or some
81:38
it seems like it's pre-packaged every
81:40
station every commercial just starts
81:42
doing it repeat it over and over
81:45
and i ask normal people i'm like do you
81:47
think it's weird that every and then you
81:49
hear it on the street these
81:50
and it i'm wondering do you know are
81:53
these
81:54
put together by think tanks like once
81:57
and ahead and they plan it out and then
81:58
they just dish it up and that's and
82:00
everybody goes along with it and then
82:02
another question related to that is
82:05
people i don't i don't live in
82:06
washington dc or know a lot of people
82:08
there but i'm wondering people at work
82:11
maybe in the federal government that
82:13
they want to consume news for themselves
82:16
and maybe they're the position where
82:17
they know it's kind of scripted
82:19
do you know what they watch do they
82:22
read the economist do they pay for the
82:24
news do they just not watch it or do
82:25
they watch the news like cnn and that
82:28
everyone else watches and believe it or
82:29
they
82:30
so
82:31
i'm looking for maybe
82:33
a source of news that people that know
82:36
things would watch for them to learn and
82:39
also kind of how this all coordinated it
82:42
just it's very interesting to me thanks
82:44
great thanks paulie
82:47
cool paulie i would say
82:49
let me uh answer the first uh second
82:51
question first all people throughout
82:54
washington dc
82:56
because i have worked there in the past
82:59
all the uh especially in leadership
83:01
roles
83:02
uh throughout washington dc
83:04
they all i'm sorry to say they all read
83:07
the new york times
83:08
they all go
83:10
to the new york times for their
83:12
information
83:13
and ultimately for what they believe and
83:15
they all watch
83:17
pretty much they all watch cnn as well
83:20
that's just the way it is that's what
83:22
they have playing in the background when
83:24
they're
83:25
doing their
83:26
doing their work or their assignments or
83:28
whatever
83:29
to find out up to the minute news at
83:32
that point
83:33
and that's a very that's a very sad
83:35
thing
83:36
because um
83:38
new york times and cnn have
83:41
proven themselves to be
83:43
completely fake
83:45
so many times so many times
83:49
it's just ridiculous to try to keep
83:51
count
83:52
of how many times they've lost
83:54
defamation suits how many times they've
83:56
been sued for
83:58
wrong information damaging information
84:00
intentionally slanderous information
84:03
uh you can't even keep counter that it's
84:05
it's just
84:06
mind-boggling
84:08
and going paulie back to your first
84:10
question
84:12
uh what i wanted to tell you was that um
84:16
there is and this is not
84:19
well i guess it is kind of a secret but
84:21
it's an open secret uh there is
84:25
a
84:26
system of
84:28
fax machines if you guys even remember
84:30
what those are
84:32
there's a system of fax machines
84:34
that are
84:35
delivered into every major newsroom
84:39
and news outlet across the country
84:42
and
84:43
that
84:44
fax machine
84:46
i i think actually i think it's in the
84:48
in the usually it's in the home
84:50
of the editor like the top editor
84:53
producer of the news
84:55
whatever and they have that fax machine
84:58
and it is a fax machine that is
85:02
distributed
85:03
from
85:04
an organization known as the uh
85:07
the board of directors of
85:10
the new york times
85:12
and the uh
85:14
and
85:15
the the new york times and they
85:17
basically put out
85:19
talking points and scripts
85:22
to on that
85:24
fax machine
85:25
to every
85:26
major news office
85:28
director basically
85:31
across the country
85:32
usually by 3 am
85:35
by 3 a.m
85:36
of the previous day
85:40
for the next for the next news cycle
85:43
and that's where they
85:45
basically and it's i think it's
85:47
technically it's from the chairman
85:49
of the new york times
85:51
and
85:52
he's that or that organization is
85:56
who creates these scripts
85:58
these talking points these
86:00
new phrases that everyone has to use and
86:03
that's the reason you see everyone using
86:05
the same things and all that so that's
86:08
where that comes from



動画(1:40:33)


The Extra-Dimensionals: True Tales And Concepts of Alien Visitors | John DeSouza | UFO HUB #42


(2021-09-11)
プロフィール

横着者

Author:横着者

最新記事
最新コメント
最新トラックバック
月別アーカイブ
カテゴリ
検索フォーム
RSSリンクの表示
リンク
ブロとも申請フォーム

この人とブロともになる

QRコード
QR